1. On-page optimization
  2. Header tags
  3. Using header tags for SEO

Header Tag Strategy for UK Schools: Advanced SEO, Accessibility & Governance | SEO for Schools

An advanced, UK-focused playbook for using H1–H6 header tags at scale: IA mapping, content patterns, accessibility alignment, multi-site governance, QA and more

Header Tag Strategy for UK Schools: Advanced SEO, Accessibility & Governance | SEO for Schools
Header Tag Strategy for UK Schools: Advanced SEO, Accessibility & Governance | <a href="https://www.seoforschools.co.uk/keyword-research-using-competitor-analysis-for-keyword-research">SEO for Schools</a> header tags at scale: IA mapping, content patterns, accessibility alignment, multi-site governance, QA, and print-screen checklists." />

On-Page SEO for Schools

Header Tag Strategy for UK Schools: Advanced SEO, Accessibility & Governance

Published by SEO for Schools • Author: Paul Delaney

Objective: implement H1–H6 headings as a repeatable system across your school website (or multi-academy trust), so pages are easier to scan on mobiles, clearer for screen readers, and simpler for search engines to interpret. This guide is the advanced companion to our beginner explainer—it focuses on information architecture (IA), template patterns, MAT governance, quality assurance and accessibility alignment, with print-screen checklists you can use in any CMS.

1) Start with search intent & information architecture

Headings are not decoration—they’re the spine of your page’s IA. For UK schools, parent tasks shape intent:

  • Navigational: “Term dates”, “Absence reporting”, “Uniform”.
  • Transactional/enquiry: “Book a school tour”, “Admissions form”, “Prospectus”.
  • Informational: “SEND provision”, “Clubs timetable”, “Ofsted reports”.

Map intent to a heading ladder: H1 states the outcome; H2s segment key questions; H3s break detail. This mirrors guidance to use descriptive headings and a logical hierarchy. (Source: Google SEO Starter Guide)

2) Pattern library: headings per template (copy-ready)

Admissions (conversion-led)

<h1>Admissions: How to Apply for [Year]</h1><h2>Key Dates</h2><h2>Eligibility & Oversubscription Criteria</h2><h2>Application Steps</h2> <h3>Step 1 — Prepare documents</h3> <h3>Step 2 — Submit your application</h3> <h3>Step 3 — What happens next</h3><h2>Appeals</h2>

Term Dates (zero-friction)

<h1>Term Dates [Academic Year]</h1><h2>Autumn Term</h2><h2>Spring Term</h2><h2>Summer Term</h2><h2>INSET & Holidays</h2>

Keep headings descriptive and concise. Avoid stuffing; Google emphasises people-first content and clear structure. (See Helpful content)

3) Accessibility alignment (WCAG-aware headings)

  • Programmatic structure: Use real <h1>…<h6> elements. Screen readers rely on heading navigation. (WCAG reference: Quick Ref, technique H42)
  • Logical sequence: Avoid big level jumps (H1 → H4). The spec allows flexibility, but predictable ladders are best for assistive tech.
  • Meaning before style: Don’t pick heading levels for size; style with CSS.

4) Multi-site (MAT) governance: keep headings consistent

Trusts need consistency across multiple school sites without freezing creativity. Use a lightweight content design standard:

AreaPolicyOwnerChecks
H1 policyOne clear page-level H1 stating outcome/topicComms LeadMonthly spot-checks
H2 libraryApproved H2 patterns per template (Admissions/Term Dates/Policies)Content DesignPre-publish checklist
AccessibilityHeadings are semantic, logical ladder; no headings used for stylingSEND/CommsTermly audit
SEO QATitles, meta descriptions, H1 topic alignment; avoid near-duplicate headingsSEO/CommsQuarterly review

5) Avoiding cannibalisation: “header tags” topics without overlap

This article targets strategy and operations—IA, templates, governance—distinct from the beginner explainer (definitions and basics). To avoid competing in the SERPs:

  • Link between the two with clear anchor text: “See our beginner guide to H1–H6 basics”.
  • Use unique H1/H2 phrasing here (“strategy”, “governance”, “MAT”); keep the other guide focused on “what & how headings work”.
  • Ensure internal links point to the right resource for user intent.

6) Operations: pre-publish checks that take 5 minutes

  1. H1 sanity: Does it state the page outcome? Is it unique within the site?
  2. H2 segmentation: Do H2s reflect common parent tasks/questions?
  3. H3 clarity: Nested correctly? No generic labels like “Information”.
  4. Title & H1 harmony: Topic aligned but not necessarily identical. (Starter Guide)
  5. Anchor links (optional): On long pages, add a contents box that links to H2s via IDs.

7) Examples: transforming vague headings into task-oriented ones

Weak

  • H1: “Admissions”
  • H2: “Information”
  • H2: “More details”

Stronger

  • H1: “Admissions: How to Apply for September 2026”
  • H2: “Key Dates”
  • H2: “Eligibility & Oversubscription Criteria”
  • H2: “Application Steps” → H3s: Step 1/2/3

8) Technical notes: HTML, anchors & structured data

  • HTML semantics: Headings convey document structure to users and search engines. (Spec: WHATWG Headings & sections)
  • Anchors for UX: Give H2s IDs so users can jump to sections quickly (especially on mobiles).
  • Structured data: Schema does not replace headings; it complements them. Keep both accurate and consistent. (See Search Central — Structured data)

9) Limited CMS? Still achievable

  • Use the editor’s heading styles (not bold paragraphs).
  • If you can’t add anchor IDs, place a short “On this page” list that mirrors H2 text.
  • Build print-screen cards (below) so staff can screenshot guidance—no downloads needed.

10) Quality assurance: spot issues fast

  1. Open the page → right-click → Inspect → check the headings outline (Accessibility pane works well).
  2. Scan for level jumps (H1→H4), duplicate H1s, or headings used as style.
  3. Confirm the first H2s match the top tasks parents expect.
  4. Re-read headings by themselves; do they tell the story without the body text?

Print-screen checklists (no downloads)

Heading Audit Card (per page)

Screenshot or print this card
  1. One clear H1 (unique topic/outcome).
  2. H2s = parent tasks/questions.
  3. H3s nest correctly; no vague labels.
  4. No headings used purely for style.
  5. Title & H1 aligned in topic.
  6. Anchor links to H2s (optional, for long pages).
  7. Logical order (no level jumps).
  8. Semantics verified in DevTools.
  9. Readable on mobile (short, scannable).
  10. Accessibility: headings are true H1–H6.

MAT Governance Card

Screenshot or print this card
  • H1 rule: one topic/outcome, per page.
  • Template patterns: approved H2/H3 lists.
  • Accessibility: WCAG H42 compliance.
  • SEO QA: Titles↔H1 harmony; unique headings.
  • Cadence: monthly spot-checks; termly audit.

Copy-ready snippets

Anchored contents box (long pages)

<nav aria-label="On this page"> <h2 id="contents">On this page</h2> <ul> <li><a href="#key-dates">Key Dates</a></li> <li><a href="#eligibility">Eligibility & Criteria</a></li> <li><a href="#steps">Application Steps</a></li> </ul></nav><h2 id="key-dates">Key Dates</h2><!-- content --><h2 id="eligibility">Eligibility & Criteria</h2><!-- content --><h2 id="steps">Application Steps</h2><h3 id="step-1">Step 1 — Prepare documents</h3>

Accessible, descriptive headings (Admissions)

<h1>Admissions: How to Apply for September 2026</h1><p>Short intro explaining who this page is for.</p><h2>Key Dates</h2><h2>Eligibility & Oversubscription Criteria</h2><h2>Application Steps</h2>

Measurement & governance KPIs

KPITargetWhy it matters
Pages with a single, clear H1~100%Clarity and accessibility
Pages with logical H2/H3 ladder≥ 95%Scanability on mobiles
Pages with descriptive, non-stuffed headings≥ 95%Helpful content & readability
Template adherence across MAT≥ 90%Consistency and scale

FAQs (Featured Snippet-ready)

Should every page have exactly one H1?

It’s the pragmatic, accessible approach for school sites: one page-level H1 that states the topic or outcome. While the HTML spec allows more nuanced structures, a single H1 reduces confusion. (Spec: WHATWG Headings & sections)

Do headings influence SEO directly?

Headings make content understandable; they are part of creating helpful, organised pages for users, which aligns with Google’s guidance. They’re not a “hack”, but they support clarity and relevance. (Source: SEO Starter GuideHelpful content)

What heading mistakes hurt accessibility?

Using headings purely for size, skipping levels (H1→H4), or replacing headings with bold paragraphs. Follow WCAG guidance and use real H1–H6 elements. (WCAG Quick Ref; technique H42)

How do we avoid cannibalisation with other “header tags” content?

Segment intent: keep this page on strategy/governance and link to the beginner guide for definitions. Use distinct H1/H2 wording and internal links that route users correctly.

Need practical SEO support?

Speak With Paul Delaney

Paul Delaney helps schools turn complex SEO into simple, effective actions. As a guest writer for SEO for Schools, Paul shares step-by-step playbooks and evidence-based guidance that busy teams can apply immediately. With three decades’ experience working with UK and international institutions, he understands the challenges school teams face and is well positioned to offer support and guidance.

For our readers, Paul offers free 30-minute sessions for institutions exploring how to raise visibility, strengthen brand trust and streamline admissions. Sessions are practical, jargon-free and free from sales pressure. You can contact him using the buttons below—please mention SEOforSchools.co.uk.

Paul Delaney
Paul Delaney

Paul Delaney is Director at Content Ranked, a London-based digital marketing agency. He has been working in Education since the 1990s and has held significant positions at multinational education brands, EAC (UK)/TUI Travel PLC, the Eurocentres Foundation, and OISE, amongst others. Content Ranked focuses on SEO strategy and support for educational organisations in the UK and Global marketplaces. Paul is also Marketing Director at Seed Educational Consulting Ltd, a study abroad agency helping African students study at university abroad.